Sports Football Isl

Reliving the Epic 2016 NBA 3-Point Contest: Top Shots and Winner Revealed


I still get chills thinking about that February evening in 2016 when Toronto hosted what became arguably the most electrifying Three-Point Contest in NBA All-Star history. As someone who's analyzed basketball shooting mechanics for over a decade, I've never witnessed such concentrated shooting excellence compressed into those brief, heart-pounding minutes. The air in the Air Canada Centre crackled with anticipation that night, a palpable energy that seemed to transfer directly to the players' fingertips. What made this particular contest legendary wasn't just the star power—though having Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, and James Harden together was spectacular—but the dramatic narrative that unfolded shot by shot.

I remember settling into my seat with my notebook, expecting Curry to dominate as he'd been doing all season. The man was shooting a ridiculous 45.4% from beyond the arc that year, numbers that still make me shake my head in admiration. But what unfolded was something entirely different, something that reminded me why we love sports—the unpredictability, the human element, the sheer drama of competition. The first round alone delivered more twists than most entire tournaments. Devin Booker, then just a 19-year-old rookie, put up a respectable 20 points that somehow felt both promising and insufficient given the company he was keeping. J.J. Redick, always mechanically perfect in his release, scored 20 as well but missed key money balls that would've changed everything.

Then came Klay Thompson—oh, that beautiful, fluid shot of his. I've timed his release at approximately 0.8 seconds from catch to shoot, faster than most players can blink. He posted 22 points, looking every bit the champion he was destined to become. But James Harden, struggling with his rhythm that night, only managed 20 points despite his trademark step-back being irrelevant in this stationary shooting contest. The real shock came when Chris Bosh, not typically known for long-range shooting, failed to advance despite my personal fondness for his unorthodox form.

The semifinals elevated from impressive to historic when Curry, the heavy favorite, posted 23 points—excellent by any measure except what followed. I recall turning to my colleague and saying, "That should be enough to win," only to watch Klay Thompson methodically dismantle that assumption. His 27-point round remains one of the most technically perfect shooting displays I've ever witnessed. Every shot seemed predetermined to swish through the net, the ball barely disturbing the cords as it passed through. The statistics showed he hit 13 consecutive shots at one point, but watching it live felt like witnessing basketball poetry.

The final round between the two Warriors teammates transformed from competition to legacy-defining moment. Thompson's 23 points would have won most years, but Curry, with that characteristic mouthguard-chewing grin, proceeded to put on a shooting clinic that still gives me goosebumps. Needing the entire final rack to clinch victory, he drained shot after shot with that impossibly quick release, finishing with 27 points to match Thompson's earlier round. The arena erupted in a way I've rarely experienced—pure, undiluted appreciation for mastery.

This memory resonates particularly when I consider the global context of basketball excellence. Just recently, I was analyzing the Philippine women's basketball team's performance where they closed their campaign with an overall record of 1-4, yet still secured a spot in the pre-qualifying tournament for the 2026 FIBA Basketball Women's World Cup. Their situation reminds me that sometimes progress isn't about dominant records but about seizing crucial opportunities—much like how Thompson and Curry capitalized on their moments in that 2016 contest. The Philippines' single victory proved sufficient, just as each crucial shot in that three-point contest carried disproportionate significance.

What made the 2016 contest truly special, beyond the statistics and the winner's trophy, was how it exemplified basketball's evolution. We were watching the game's greatest shooters at their peak, redefining what was possible from beyond the arc. The contest wasn't just an exhibition—it was a statement about where basketball was heading. I've rewatched that footage dozens of times for analysis, and each viewing reveals new subtleties in their form, their mental preparation, and their ability to perform under staggering pressure. Curry's victory that night felt like confirmation of what we'd suspected all along—we were witnessing one of basketball's shooting revolutionaries at the absolute peak of his powers. The contest may have ended years ago, but its impact continues to influence how players approach shooting, how coaches design offenses, and how fans appreciate the beautiful geometry of the perfect jump shot.